As I was watching the morning segments of the talk shows on TV, one program from NTV7, Breakfast Show, strikes me most. The topic for the day was Banduan Akhir (Amnesty International Malaysia stand against death penalty).
One statement that the guest speaker mentioned was If the rule of "eye for an eye", were to be accepted, the world will go blind. And ... this reminds me of another statement I heard way back when PAS Government in Kelantan wants to introduce Hudud Law, "if you cut the hand that steal", than in Malaysia, people will be without hand.
And all those debate and discussion on Islam by people who have good intention or thought that they have good intention. We might as well remember about this word "Islamphobia".
Who actually represent Islam today?
Who is this person "Muslim?"
Why a "Muslim" and or his deen (as oppose to religion), Islam always look upon with suspicion?
Why ... why ... why ???
One statement that the guest speaker mentioned was If the rule of "eye for an eye", were to be accepted, the world will go blind. And ... this reminds me of another statement I heard way back when PAS Government in Kelantan wants to introduce Hudud Law, "if you cut the hand that steal", than in Malaysia, people will be without hand.
And all those debate and discussion on Islam by people who have good intention or thought that they have good intention. We might as well remember about this word "Islamphobia".
Who actually represent Islam today?
Who is this person "Muslim?"
Why a "Muslim" and or his deen (as oppose to religion), Islam always look upon with suspicion?
Why ... why ... why ???
No comments:
Post a Comment